New advice to drivers on how to overtake cyclists is dangerously different to that given in the Highway Code.
Stephen Hammond, the new road safety minister, has this morning unveiled the Department for Transport's £80,000 'Think Cyclist' campaign. However, a tips section for drivers on how best to overtake cyclists differs from the official advice given in the Highway Code.
Rule 163 of the Highway Code states "give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car" and illustrates this advice with a photograph of a motorist leaving a full car's width when overtaking a cyclist.
In the new 'Think Cyclist' campaign drivers are advised to "Give cyclists space – at least half a car’s width."

The new advice also has differing advice on 'advanced stop lines', the cycle-only boxes found at many traffic lights and junctions. 'Think Cyclist' says "Avoid driving over advance (sic) stop lines' but rule 178 of the Highway Code says "Motorists, including motorcyclists, MUST stop at the first white line reached if the lights are amber or red and should avoid blocking the way or encroaching on the marked area at other times."
Article continues belowAdvertisement
The rest of the DfT campaign is good, solid advice, pointing out that "drivers and cyclists have more in common than is often realised."
A press release said "With 80% of cyclists holding a driving licence, and 1 in 5 drivers cycling at least once a month , they’re often the same people."
Stephen Hammond was recently appointed as road safety minister following the sacking of Mike Penning. Hammond signed off the new DfT campaign, which was produced by Forster, a communications agency.
Hammond said: “We take the issue of cycle safety extremely seriously. With interest in cycling heightened by Bradley Wiggins winning the Tour de France and our cyclists’ extraordinary success at the Olympics and Paralympics too, we want to remind cyclists and drivers of the importance of looking out for each other to avoid accidents.
“Many people cycle and drive and a new poll shows both road user groups agree that looking twice at junctions, as well as giving each other space on the road, are practical things that we can all do to help reduce the numbers of cyclists killed and seriously injured on our roads each year.”
Cheryl Campsie of Forster defended the use of the 'half a car's width' analogy:
"It’s important when you’re driving to give other road users plenty of space. The Highway Code doesn’t specify how much space as it’s important that road users take all the circumstances into account when overtaking. However, we would expect cars to give at least half a car’s space when overtaking a cyclist."
This is the first time that the DfT's Think! campaign has targeted cyclists and drivers together.
The campaign will be working with motoring and cycling organisations nationally and locally to help to get safety messages to their members, said a statement from the DfT.
Motoring organisation bosses are quoted on the DfT press release but there are no quotes from cycling organisations.
"They did consult [us] and we gave them considerable feedback, pointing out the errors," said Chris Peck, CTC's policy coordinator.
"You will see from the press release that none of the cycling organisations offered a quote to the DfT. We certainly don't agree with the line on overtaking."
RAC technical director David Bizley said: “Many of our members are cyclists as well as drivers and we are keen to see greater awareness of the needs and risks presented by modern road use to, potentially, vulnerable cyclists.”
AA President Edmund King said: "As fuel prices rise and fitness moves higher up the agenda there will be more cyclists. Drivers need to think more about cyclists on the road."

Here's the Think Cyclist advice in full:
When you’re driving
1. Look out for cyclists, especially when turning - make eye contact if possible so they know you’ve seen them
2. Use your indicators - signal your intentions so that cyclists can react
3. Give cyclists space – at least half a car’s width. If there isn’t sufficient space to pass, hold back. Remember that cyclists may need to manoeuvre suddenly if the road is poor, it’s windy or if a car door is opened.
4. Always check for cyclists when you open your car door
5. Avoid driving over advance stop lines – these allow cyclists to get to the front and increase their visibility
6. Follow the Highway Code including ‘stop’ and ‘give way’ signs and traffic lights
When you’re cycling 1. Ride positively, decisively and well clear of the kerb – look and signal to show drivers what you plan to do and make eye contact where possible so you know drivers have seen you.
2. Avoid riding up the inside of large vehicles, like lorries or buses, where you might not be seen
3. Always use lights after dark or when visibility is poor
4. Wearing light coloured or reflective clothing during the day and reflective clothing and/or accessories in the dark increases your visibility
5. Follow the Highway Code including observing ‘stop’ and ‘give way’ signs and traffic lights
6. THINK! recommends wearing a correctly fitted cycle helmet, which is securely fastened and conforms to current regulations
















Add a new comment
You need to be logged in to post comments. If you do not have an account then please register.
Comments
4 comments
The concept of giving room or giving space" will always be open to different interpretations. Are we talking about the space between the overtaker and the overtaken, or to the edge of the road? The terminologies of the Highway Code and of THINK do subtly differ. The Highway Code speaks of giving room, but it's only thanks to the picture that we can be certain that 'room' means the distance to the kerb. (Most drivers seem happy to leave a much smaller gap than that between their vehicle and another car.) THINK on the other hand, speaks of giving cyclists 'space'. I would argue that 'space' can't have anything solid in it, or else it's not a space, so that must mean the gap between bike and car. If that's half a car's width not only am I happy but also we have no apparent conflict with the picture in the Highway Code. Or its wording, if we assume its 'room' has a vehicle in it. But we really need a less ambiguous way of talking about this.
Chris Juden Sep 20th 2012 at 1:58PM
0 0Which is why the pic in the Highway Code is so useful: picture = 1k words etc.
Carlton Reid Sep 20th 2012 at 2:41PM
0 1One issue this does not address, and one that many drivers, with no malice towards cyclists, get wrong, is perception of speed. It seems to me that many drivers see cyclists as slow or almost stationary objects and make no allowance for the speed at which we can be travelling. I'm sure this, not actual homicidal intent, is the reason why so many drivers overtake and then immediately turn left; they just fail to compute where a cyclist travelling at 15 or 20mph will be by the time they slow down to turn. And then they're surprised when the cyclist, shocked and scared, makes some angry comment, and start getting angry in their turn.
Jon Sparks Sep 20th 2012 at 4:40PM
0 0Jon Correct. It's a shame the campaign could't ram home the need for drivers to slow down when anywhere near walkers, horse-riders and cyclists. A car overtaking at 30mph in a 30mph zone, 1.5 metres from the side of the cyclist, is a whole different kettle of coconuts to a car doing same overtake at 20mph.
Carlton Reid Sep 20th 2012 at 4:47PM
0 0