Road death increase prompts call for 'tighter cycling laws'
Graham Allen, MP for Nottingham North, is to campaign for laws to force cyclists to wear helmets, reports the Nottingham Post.
Following a rise in cyclist deaths on local roads close to his constituency – from two last year to seven this year – Allen will join a delegation of councillors on a trip to Westminster next week to meet Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary for State.
The call, likely to be unpopular with the majority of cyclists, will also be made alongside a call that all bicycle sales include helmet, high vis clothing and lights – as well as banning BMX bikes on public roads.
However the delegation will also call for better cycle provisions, namely more dedicated cycle paths and more cash for training in schools.
There's more at the Nottingham Post.
Article continues belowAdvertisement
The contentious 'compulsory helmets' subject is one that rumbles on. Last year another MP – Annette Brooke – called for a helmet compulsion bill for children. Earlier this year Bradley Wiggins and Team GB's Jacob Roberts waded into the debate. A widely held feeling, in the industry at least, is that such a law would have a detremental impact on the number of people willing to cycle. Perhaps even more controversially, some research has found the impact of helmets in accidents to be questionable.
There's more on the topic here.















Add a new comment
You need to be logged in to post comments. If you do not have an account then please register.
Comments
5 comments
Blah blah.... here we go again. The bike isn't the danger it is the car. It is a bit like making everyone wear bullet proof vests in case they get shot.
David Beacham Nov 1st 2012 at 1:48PM
0 1In my experience, compulsory helmet-wearing is less likely to result in reduced road traffic deaths among cyclists than infrastructure measures such as dedicated cycle paths and education measures such as advertising campaigns, road signs, and increased training for both cyclists and car drivers. It is good to see this delegation is including the latter as well as the former in its presentation. My understanding is that the ANSI standard for bicycle helmets accounts for crashes in which the cyclist is travelling at speeds of up to 15 mph and has impact with a smooth rigid surface such as un-cratered road. Most cars travel a lot faster than 15 mph. In all of the fatal cycling accidents I have seen (sadly far too many), and non-fatal but resulting in permanent disability (also too many), the cyclist was wearing a helmet. I have also seen non-fatal accidents with speeds of 20+ mph in which the helmet was destroyed and the cyclist survived. It is impossible to say with certainty whether or not these accidents would have been fatal had the cyclist not been wearing a helmet. All things considered, I see it as a good idea for a cyclist to wear a helmet as this will likely prevent concussion and abrasions in a low-speed accident. but making helmets compulsory as part of a cyclist safety campaign is likely to result mainly in a false sense of security if reducing fatalities is the goal. Useful article: http://bjsportmed.com/content/24/1/55.full.pdf
Paul Skilbeck Nov 1st 2012 at 7:22PM
0 0Wanting to ban B m x from public roads? I would love to hear the reasons behind that one.
Jay Roberts Nov 2nd 2012 at 6:16PM
0 0Try making car drivers and car passengers wear helmets? there are more of them. more get killed, I wear a helmet.. but sometimes I don't! Am I really going to be punished through the law because car drivers are not concentrating on what they are doing!? I say wear a helmet if you want (ten bob head , ten bob hat natural selection policy) but make the law the same as in Holland. All so all car drivers and cyclist to be re-assessed for standard's of road use every three years. Cars don't kill cyclists, people do! timax. ( BMX are legally can ride on the pavement anyway, 20" wheels)
Gary Lee Cooper Nov 3rd 2012 at 8:06AM
0 0I can't imagine (any logical reason) why anyone believes BMX bikes shouldn't be allowed on Public roads. As for helmets, they are a side issue, it's motor-vehicles and primarily cars and the way they are driven that are the problem, particularly in close proximity to cyclists and pedestrians. If someone invented a helmet that would deflect cars and leave me unharmed, I buy one.
Christopher Sauvarin Jan 22nd 2013 at 2:30PM
0 0