No helmet? That's contributory negligence... - BikeBiz

No helmet? That's contributory negligence...

New court ruling sets precedent for accident counterclaims
Publish date:
Social count:
124_Picture 1.jpg

A recent High Court judgement has taken into account whether or not a cyclist was wearing a helmet during a road collision, outlining that a cyclist is guilty of contributory negligence for choosing not to.

Despite helmet use not being compulsory under UK law, the judge overseeing Smith v Finch 2009 ruled the cyclist to be partially liable if wearing a helmet could be proven to have prevented any injuries sustained.

BikeRadar spoke to Richard Brooks from law firm Withy King who said: "this ruling means that if you are injured and a cycle helmet could have reduced your injuries, you may not be able to recover full compensation."

In this particular case Mr Smith was involved in a collision with Mr. Finch who was aboard a Yamaha motorcycle. Smith suffered serious head injuries, which resulted in him having no recollection of the crash.

The CTC has much more on this story here.

Featured Jobs

cycles service promo

Shop Manager/ Head Mechanic

Cycleservice Limited I Sidmouth, East Devon I Salary: £22,000 Plus Share Incentives Available I Date Published Wednesday 30th May 2018

Giant St Paul Logo

Bike Fitter / Sales Person

Giant St Pauls I City of London I Salary: Negotiable Dependent on Experience I Date Published Thursday 21st June 2018


Social Media Executive

Sigma Sports I Hampton Wick, Surrey I £22,000 to £24,000 per year I Date Published Monday 4th June 2018